<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LEGAL INDIA : LAW NETWORK OF LAWYERS, ADVOCATES &#38; LAW FIRMS OF INDIA : NEWS, VIEWS &#38; ARTICLES : LEGAL QUERY, HELP, ADVICE &#38; OPINION &#187; Miscellaneous Legal News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalindia.in/category/legal-news/miscellaneous-legal-news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalindia.in</link>
	<description>LEGAL / LAW NETWORK OF INDIA IS A FREE LAW RESOURCES &#38; LEGAL NEWS PORTAL of INDIAN LAWS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Election Commission notifies ban on Exit Polls in five states</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/election-commission-notifies-ban-on-exit-polls-in-five-states</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/election-commission-notifies-ban-on-exit-polls-in-five-states#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representation of the People Act 1951]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 126 A]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Election Commission has notified the period for ban on Exit poll from 0700 hrs on January 28 to 1730 hrs on March 3 as required under section 126 A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, both on electronic and print media about the ongoing elections to legislative assemblies in five states. Besides, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/election-commission-notifies-ban-on-exit-polls-in-five-states/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court reserves order on officials&#8217; appraisal reports</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/court-reserves-order-on-officials-appraisal-reports</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/court-reserves-order-on-officials-appraisal-reports#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Prashant Bhushan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Information Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Delhi High Court Tuesday reserved its order on a plea that performance appraisal reports of government staffers, officially known as the Annual Confidential Report (ACR), should be available under the Right to Information (RTI) Act in “public interest”. The petitioner — RTI activist R.K. Jain — has raised the question whether performance appraisal reports [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/court-reserves-order-on-officials-appraisal-reports/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyber attack on website of petitioner against Facebook, others</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/cyber-attack-on-website-of-petitioner-against-facebook-others</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/cyber-attack-on-website-of-petitioner-against-facebook-others#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber attack on website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The website of a petitioner and Islamic scholar who dragged Facebook, Google, Yahoo and others to court over allegedly objectionable content has been defaced and left with a message &#8220;Probably best not to piss the social networking sites off!&#8221; Petitioner Mufti Aijaz Arshad Qasmi told that his website www.fatwaonline.in has been defaced for the past [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/cyber-attack-on-website-of-petitioner-against-facebook-others/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calcutta High Court stays compensation to hooch victims&#8217; families</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/calcutta-high-court-stays-compensation-to-hooch-victims-families</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/calcutta-high-court-stays-compensation-to-hooch-victims-families#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December's hooch tragedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Sambuddha Chakrabarti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief justice J.N. Patel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Calcutta High Court Monday stayed the payment of compensation declared by the West Bengal government to the families of victims of last December&#8217;s hooch tragedy in South 24 Parganas. The division bench of Chief Justice J.N. Patel and Justice Sambuddha Chakrabarti stayed the payment of compensation for eight weeks in a public interest litigation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/calcutta-high-court-stays-compensation-to-hooch-victims-families/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Objectionable content: Facebook, others get 15 days to file replies</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/objectionable-content-facebook-others-get-15-days-to-file-replies</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/objectionable-content-facebook-others-get-15-days-to-file-replies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[22 social networking websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objectionable content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google and facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Admonishing internet firms like Google and Facebook, a Delhi court on Monday gave 15 days to 22 social networking sites to remove &#8216;objectionable&#8217; contents from their websites. According to media reports, a judge presiding over the matter said that these sites did not deserve any more time. These firms have been asked to file a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/objectionable-content-facebook-others-get-15-days-to-file-replies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court issues notice to Centre on clinical trials</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/supreme-court-issues-notice-to-centre-on-clinical-trials</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/supreme-court-issues-notice-to-centre-on-clinical-trials#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice R.M. Lodha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madhya Pradesh-based 'Swasthya Adhikar Manch']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court Monday issued notice to the central government on a plea seeking investigation into illegal and unethical clinical trials of drugs which are yet to be approved by the drug controller. An Apex Court bench headed by Justice R.M. Lodha issued notice on a plea by Madhya Pradesh-based &#8216;Swasthya Adhikar Manch&#8217; that, in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/supreme-court-issues-notice-to-centre-on-clinical-trials/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barred from Shivaji Park, MNS threatens street rally</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/barred-from-shivaji-park-mns-threatens-street-rally</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/barred-from-shivaji-park-mns-threatens-street-rally#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MNS chief Raj Thackeray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationalist Congress Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bombay High Court Friday rejected the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena&#8217;s (MNS) petition for permission to hold a poll rally at Shivaji Park. Terming the move as &#8220;partisan&#8221;, MNS chief Raj Thackeray said his party would hold the rally on Mumbai streets. The court rejected the petition to hold the rally Feb 13 on the grounds [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/barred-from-shivaji-park-mns-threatens-street-rally/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi poll panel gets notice on MCD elections</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/delhi-poll-panel-gets-notice-on-mcd-elections</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/delhi-poll-panel-gets-notice-on-mcd-elections#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Rajiv Shakdher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCD elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Delhi High Court Friday sought the state election commission&#8217;s response to a plea that has challenged the earmarking of seats as reserved for the Scheduled Castes (SC) in the April 2012 elections to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). A bench of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Rajiv Shakdher Friday issued a notice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/delhi-poll-panel-gets-notice-on-mcd-elections/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prosecuting corrupt officials: court sets deadline for government</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/prosecuting-corrupt-officials-court-sets-deadline-for-government</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/prosecuting-corrupt-officials-court-sets-deadline-for-government#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court sets deadline for government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that the government should give sanction to prosecute accused officials within 3 months. If there is need for any consultation with the legal authorities, the government might give its sanction within 4 months. However, the SC left it for Parliament to frame guidelines for giving sanction to prosecute officials. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/prosecuting-corrupt-officials-court-sets-deadline-for-government/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court questions Gujarat on probe against Setalvad</title>
		<link>http://www.legalindia.in/supreme-court-questions-gujarat-on-probe-against-setalvad</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalindia.in/supreme-court-questions-gujarat-on-probe-against-setalvad#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>legalnews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Aftab Alam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice R.P. Desai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalindia.in/?p=16689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court Monday asked the Gujarat government why it was recording statements of witnesses alleging that social activist Teesta Setalvad doctored affidavits of victims of the 2002 riots when the proceedings had already been stayed by the court. The apex court bench of Justice Aftab Alam and Justice R.P. Desai asked the state government [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalindia.in/supreme-court-questions-gujarat-on-probe-against-setalvad/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

